Quasi-Experimental Research

Abstract representation of quasi-experimental research and social innovation
0:00
Quasi-experimental research evaluates causal effects without randomization, providing credible evidence for social and development interventions where experiments are impractical.

Importance of Quasi-Experimental Research

Quasi-experimental research evaluates causal relationships when random assignment is not possible or ethical. It is important because many social and development interventions cannot be tested under strict experimental conditions, yet still require rigorous evidence of effectiveness. In development and social innovation, quasi-experimental research matters because it provides credible insights into program impact while accommodating real-world constraints.

Definition and Features

Quasi-experimental research is a study design that assesses the effects of interventions without full randomization. Its defining features include:

  • Non-Random Assignment – participants are allocated based on existing groups, eligibility, or circumstances.
  • Comparison Groups – uses matched groups, statistical controls, or natural experiments to approximate a counterfactual.
  • Causal Inference – seeks to estimate cause-and-effect while acknowledging limitations.
  • Design Variants – includes difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, propensity score matching, and instrumental variables.
  • Practical Applicability – more feasible in applied settings than randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

How this Works in Practice

In practice, quasi-experimental research may compare outcomes between schools that adopted a new curriculum and similar schools that did not, or assess the impact of a health program by analyzing communities that gained access at different times. For example, regression discontinuity can be used to evaluate scholarship programs awarded based on cutoff scores. Challenges include selection bias, difficulty finding appropriate comparison groups, and ensuring robustness of statistical methods.

Implications for Social Innovation

Quasi-experimental research strengthens social innovation by offering rigorous evidence where experiments are impractical. For practitioners, it provides a feasible way to test and refine interventions in real-world settings. For funders and policymakers, it delivers credible insights that support scaling decisions without requiring full randomization. Quasi-experimental research balances rigor with practicality to generate actionable knowledge.

Categories

Subcategories

Share

Subscribe to Newsletter.

Featured Terms

Philanthropic Stewardship

Learn More >
Conceptual illustration of philanthropic stewardship and social change

Voucher / Subsidy Models

Learn More >
Illustration representing voucher and subsidy models for social access

Communities of Practice

Learn More >
Diverse group collaborating and sharing knowledge in a community setting

Problem Tree / Solution Tree Mapping

Learn More >
diagram of problem and solution tree mapping concept

Related Articles

Community members collaborating in participatory research

Participatory Action Research

Participatory Action Research centers communities as co-creators of knowledge, promoting equity and actionable solutions through collaborative inquiry and empowerment, enhancing social innovation and legitimacy.
Learn More >
Graphical representation of longitudinal research tracking changes over time

Longitudinal Research

Longitudinal research tracks the same subjects over time to reveal changes, causal relationships, and sustained impacts, crucial for understanding social, health, and economic outcomes and improving social innovation.
Learn More >
Abstract representation of scientific research and innovation concepts

Basic Research

Basic research expands fundamental knowledge without immediate application, laying the groundwork for breakthroughs in health, technology, and social innovation through curiosity-driven inquiry.
Learn More >
Filter by Categories